Blogs
Catch up on the latest guidance from our experts, including their insight on workforce management, automation and process optimization trends.
Canon is offering helpful insights that you can leverage to answer some of your most pressing questions about improving accounts payable processing.
This is my third and final column in a series on reducing the risk of inadvertent disclosure of privileged and confidential information. My focus here is to examine a few practices worth considering when structuring legal document review and production processes.
In Part 2 of this series on reducing the risk of inadvertent disclosure of privileged and confidential information, I’ll spotlight how Federal Rule of Evidence 502 seeks to minimize costs related to litigation, particularly with respect to electronic discovery.
This is my first post in a series that will examine how attorneys, their support staff and litigation teams, and outside vendors can protect against inadvertent disclosure of privileged and confidential information.
My colleague at Canon Business Process Services, Baron Brady, Solutions Engineer, Legal-Information Governance solutions, points out that becoming paper-lite remains a challenging prospect for many organizations as long as so much incoming content enters the mailroom in the form of paper.
In my previous blog post I highlighted some of the key differences between transformation and automation. As a reminder, both approaches are necessary. However in this post I will focus on the short- and medium-term benefits that automation can supply when implemented correctly.
Previously, I highlighted one key solution that can help meet the challenge of reducing eDiscovery costs. In this, my final post in this series, I will spotlight a second solution—technology assisted review (TAR)—that can also help legal professionals achieve this goal.
A recording of our recent webcast, “Facilities Management Challenges and Opportunities in the Year Ahead,” is now available.